Endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis and treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

Chronic liver disease has emerged as a significant global concern, with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) representing a critical consequence of this disease. However, early detection of HCC remains challenging in clinical practice. Recently, there has been a growing interest in applying endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as a diagnostic tool for gastrointestinal diseases. Nevertheless, using EUS to diagnose and treat HCC is uncommon. In this review we described the diagnostic and therapeutic applications of EUS in primary HCC and evaluated its clinical significance. The diagnostic procedures primarily involve EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy or aspiration, assessment of metastatic lymph nodes and portal vein thrombosis, portal pressure monitoring, and portal vein blood collection. Treatment mainly includes EUS-guided tumor ablation, brachytherapy, injectable chemotherapy, and managing variceal hemorrhage related to portal hypertension.

An Unusual Cause of Pancreatic Tumor.

Pancreatic tuberculosis (TB) is a rare condition that can be challenging to distinguish from other pancreatic neoplasms. We present the case of a 48-year-old Indian male who complained of persistent vague epigastric pain for two months. Other physicians saw him and treated him like a dyspeptic case. He gave a history of daily alcohol consumption. Routine investigations, including amylase and lipase levels, were within normal limits. However, an abdominal ultrasound revealed a cystic lesion in the body of the pancreas, prompting further investigation. A subsequent abdominal CT scan revealed a tumor of 6x4 cm in diameter with solid and cystic components in the pancreatic body. Although tumor markers were not remarkable, inflammatory markers showed elevated levels of ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) of 95 mm/hr and CRP (C-reactive protein) of 83 mg/L, with normal hemoglobin. Endosonography (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) was performed to achieve a definitive diagnosis. EUS was performed with a linear echoendoscope, which revealed the mass, which had solid and cystic components. Fluid was aspirated from the cystic part and FNA passes were performed in the solid part. Microscopic examination and aspirated fluid culture confirmed the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, while the solid part revealed caseation-indicated granulomas, indicative of TB. The patient was promptly initiated on a seven-month course of three anti-TB medications, leading to normalization of ESR and CRP levels during the treatment period. A follow-up abdominal CT scan showed complete resolution of the pancreatic lesion, indicating successful management. This case is rare and all the data in the literature is mainly in the form of case reports. Using EUS with FNA has transformed the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy into a curable disease that could be easily managed with anti-TB medications.

Diagnostic Performance of Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography for Differential Diagnosis of Gallbladder Polyp.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is difficult to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder (GB) polyps before surgery. Endoscopic ultrasound-elastography (EUS-EG) is a non-invasive complementary diagnostic method. The utility of EUS-EG in the differential diagnosis of GB polyps has not been investigated. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of EUS-EG for the differential diagnosis of GB polyps. METHODS: Patients with GB polyps were prospectively enrolled from June 2020 until November 2022. EUS-EG and semi-quantitative evaluation of the strain ratio (SR) were performed for differential diagnosis of GB polyps. Fifty-three eligible patients were divided into two groups based on the final diagnosis after surgery. Patient demographics, EUS characteristics, and SR values were compared. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff SR value that discriminates between neoplastic and non-neoplastic GB polyps. RESULTS: The median SR value for neoplastic polyps (32.93 [interquartile range: 22.37-69.02]) was significantly higher than for non-neoplastic polyps (5.40 [2.36-14.44]; p<0.001). There were significant differences in SR values between non-neoplastic, benign neoplastic (23.38 [13.62-39.04]), and malignant polyps (49.25 [27.90-82.00]). The optimal cut-off SR value to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps was 18.4. In multivariable logistic regression, SR value >18.4 (odds ratio 33.604, 95% confidence interval 2.588-436.292) was an independent predictor of neoplastic polyps. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-EG and SR values can be used as a supplementary method for evaluating GB polyps.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy for Cytohistological Diagnosis of Gallbladder Cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration and biopsy (EUS-FNAB) is a standard diagnostic procedure for pancreatic masses but not gallbladder (GB) cancer. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of EUS-FNAB for patients with suspected GB cancer (GBC). METHODS: We analyzed data from patients who underwent EUS-FNAB for suspected GBC in three hospitals between 2010 and 2023. We calculated and compared the diagnostic performance and safety of EUS-FNAB according to characteristic factors. RESULTS: Of 170 patients, 163 had GBC. EUS-FNAB samples were obtained from the GB in 125 patients and sites other than the GB in 45 patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83.4%, 100%, and 84.1%, respectively. The sensitivity and accuracy for patients with GB samples were 80.8% and 81.6%, respectively, whereas those for patients without GB samples were 90.7% and 91.1%, respectively. The sensitivity and accuracy were higher with FNB needles than with FNA needles, and with ≤22-gauge needles than with 25-gauge needles. However, no significant differences were observed between the GB and lymph node (LN) samples. GB lesions <40 mm in size, wall-thickening type, fundal location, absence of extensive liver invasion, and distant metastasis were more frequent in patients without GB samples than in patients with GB samples. Four mild bleeding events were the only reported adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNAB was safe and showed high diagnostic performance for patients with suspected GBC, regardless of the target site. When appropriate GB targeting is difficult, targeting the LNs would be a good strategy with comparable outcomes.

Revealing Insights: A Comprehensive Overview of Gastric Outlet Obstruction Management, with Special Emphasis on EUS-Guided Gastroenterostomy.

Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) poses a common and challenging clinical scenario, characterized by mechanical blockage in the pylorus, distal stomach, or duodenum, resulting in symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and early satiety. Its diverse etiology encompasses both benign and malignant disorders. The spectrum of current treatment modalities extends from conservative approaches to more invasive interventions, incorporating procedures like surgical gastroenterostomy (SGE), self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) placement, and the advanced technique of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE). While surgery is favored for longer life expectancy, stents are preferred in malignant gastric outlet stenosis. The novel EUS-GE technique, employing a lumen-apposing self-expandable metal stent (LAMS), combines the immediate efficacy of stents with the enduring benefits of gastroenterostomy. Despite its promising outcomes, EUS-GE is a technically demanding procedure requiring specialized expertise and facilities.

Forward viewing liner echoendoscopy for therapeutic interventions.

Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) procedures using the forward-viewing convex EUS (FV-EUS) have been reviewed based on the articles reported to date. The earliest reported procedure is the drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using FV-EUS. However, the study on drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts focused on showing that drainage is possible with FV-EUS rather than leveraging its features. Subsequently, studies describing the characteristics of FV-EUS have been reported. By using FV-EUS in EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy, double punctures in the gastrointestinal tract can be avoided. In postoperative modified anatomical cases, using the endoscopic function of FV-EUS, procedures such as bile duct drainage from anastomosis, pancreatic duct drainage from the afferent limb, and abscess drainage from the digestive tract have been reported. When a perpendicular puncture to the gastrointestinal tract is required or when there is a need to insert the endoscope deep into the gastrointestinal tract, FV-EUS is considered among the options.

22-gauge Co-Cr versus stainless-steel Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in patients with solid pancreatic lesions.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) using Franseen needles is reportedly useful for its high diagnostic yield. This study compared the diagnostic yield and puncturing ability of EUS-TA using 22-gauge cobalt-chromium (CO-Cr) needles with those of stainless-steel Franseen needles in patients with solid pancreatic lesions. METHODS: Outcomes were compared between the 22-gauge Co-Cr Franseen needle (December 2019 to November 2020; group C) and stainless-steel needle (November 2020 to May 2022; group S). RESULTS: A total of 155 patients (group C, 75; group S, 80) were eligible. The diagnostic accuracy was 92.0% in group C and 96.3% in group S with no significant intergroup differences (p=0.32). The rate of change in the operator (from training fellows to experts) was 20.0% (15/75) in group C and 7.5% (6/80) in group S. Stainless-steel Franseen needles showed less inter-operator difference than Co-Cr needles (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Both Co-Cr and stainless-steel Franseen needles showed high diagnostic ability. Stainless-steel Franseen needles are soft and flexible; therefore, the range of puncture angles can be widely adjusted, making them suitable for training fellows to complete the procedure.

Role of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and EUS elastography in pancreatic lesions.

Pancreatic cancers have a poor prognosis, and their incident rates have risen. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is an efficient and reliable diagnostic modality for pancreatic lesions, providing high spatial resolution. However, while EUS helps to detect minor pancreatic lesions, nearly all solid pancreatic lesions are hypoechoic, which creates difficulty in making differential diagnoses of pancreatic lesions. When diagnosing pancreatic lesions, the performance of image-enhanced EUS techniques is essential, such as EUS elastography or contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS). CH-EUS diagnosis is based on assessing the vascularity of lesions, whereas tissue elasticity is measured via EUS elastography. Elastography is either strain or shear-wave, depending on the different mechanical properties being evaluated. The usefulness of enhanced EUS techniques is demonstrated in this review for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions, including solid and cystic lesions, and pancreatic cancer staging.

Current paradigm of endoscopic ultrasound in biliary and pancreatic duct drainage: an update.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the workhorse for biliary and pancreatic ductal interventions. Despite advances in both endoscopes and accessories for ERCP, it still has limitations in the presence of altered anatomy, luminal obstruction hindering access to the papilla, and proximal duct obstructions by tight stricture, calculi or intraductal growth. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) and EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD) have expanded the rescue procedures after failed ERCP. This review discusses the techniques and results of various EUS-BD procedures, as well as EUS-PDD.

Endoscopic ultrasound-based application system for predicting endoscopic resection-related outcomes and diagnosing subepithelial lesions: Multicenter prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Subepithelial lesions (SELs) are associated with various endoscopic resection (ER) outcomes and diagnostic challenges. We aimed to establish a tool for predicting ER-related outcomes and diagnosing SELs and to investigate the predictive value of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). METHODS: Phase 1 (system development) was performed in a retrospective cohort (n = 837) who underwent EUS before ER for SELs at eight hospitals. Prediction models for five key outcomes were developed using logistic regression. Models with satisfactory internal validation performance were included in a mobile application system, SEL endoscopic resection predictor (SELERP). In Phase 2, the models were externally validated in a prospective cohort of 200 patients. RESULTS: An SELERP was developed using EUS characteristics, which included 10 models for five key outcomes: post-ER ulcer management, short procedure time, long hospital stay, high medication costs, and diagnosis of SELs. In Phase 1, 10 models were derived and validated (C-statistics, 0.67-0.99; calibration-in-the-large, -0.14-0.10; calibration slopes, 0.92-1.08). In Phase 2, the derived risk prediction models showed convincing discrimination (C-statistics, 0.64-0.73) and calibration (calibration-in-the-large, -0.02-0.05; calibration slopes, 1.01-1.09) in the prospective cohort. The sensitivities and specificities of the five diagnostic models were 68.3-95.7% and 64.1-83.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We developed and prospectively validated an application system for the prediction of ER outcomes and diagnosis of SELs, which could aid clinical decision-making and facilitate patient-physician consultation. EUS features significantly contributed to the prediction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, http://www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2000040118).

Endoscopic ultrasound-rendezvous versus percutaneous-endoscopic rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for bile duct access: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or percutaneous-assisted antegrade guidewire insertion can be used to achieve biliary access when standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety of EUS-assisted rendezvous (EUS-RV) and percutaneous rendezvous (PERC-RV) ERCP. METHODS: We searched multiple databases from inception to September 2022 to identify studies reporting on EUS-RV and PERC-RV in failed ERCP. A random-effects model was used to summarize the pooled rates of technical success and adverse events with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: In total, 524 patients (19 studies) and 591 patients (12 studies) were managed by EUS-RV and PERC-RV, respectively. The pooled technical successes were 88.7% (95% CI 84.6-92.8%, I2 = 70.5%) for EUS-RV and 94.1% (95% CI 91.1-97.1%, I2 = 59.2%) for PERC-RV (P = 0.088). The technical success rates of EUS-RV and PERC-RV were comparable in subgroups of benign diseases (89.2% vs. 95.8%, P = 0.068), malignant diseases (90.3% vs. 95.5%, P = 0.193), and normal anatomy (90.7% vs. 95.9%, P = 0.240). However, patients with surgically altered anatomy had poorer technical success after EUS-RV than after PERC-RV (58.7% vs. 93.1%, P = 0.036). The pooled rates of overall adverse events were 9.8% for EUS-RV and 13.4% for PERC-RV (P = 0.686). CONCLUSIONS: Both EUS-RV and PERC-RV have exhibited high technical success rates. When standard ERCP fails, EUS-RV and PERC-RV are comparably effective rescue techniques if adequate expertise and facilities are feasible. However, in patients with surgically altered anatomy, PERC-RV might be the preferred choice over EUS-RV because of its higher technical success rate.

Mucosal and Submucosal Thickening of Esophageal Wall Is a Promising Factor in the Development of Symptoms in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Background/Aims: Asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE) is considered to be a potential precursor of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, there are few clinical parameters that can be used to evaluate the disease. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the factors involved in the symptoms of EoE by examining the clinicopathological differences between aEE and EoE. Methods: We reviewed 41 patients with esophageal eosinophilia who underwent endoscopic ultrasonography and high-resolution manometry. They were divided into the aEE group (n=16) and the EoE group (n=25) using the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease score. The patients' clinicopathological findings were collected and examined. Results: The median Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease score was 3.0 in the aEE group and 10.0 in the EoE group. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics, endoscopic findings and pathological findings. The cutoff value for wall thickening was 3.13 mm for the total esophageal wall thickness and 2.30 mm for the thickness from the surface to the muscular layer (total esophageal wall thickness: 84.0% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity; thickness from the surface to the muscular layer: 84.0% sensitivity, 68.7% specificity). The high-resolution manometry study was abnormal in seven patients (43.8%) in the aEE group and in 12 (48.0%) in the EoE group. The contractile front velocity was slower in the EoE group (p=0.026). Conclusions: The esophageal wall thickening in the lower portion of the esophagus is an important clinical factors related to the symptoms in patients with EoE.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticoduodenostomy versus percutaneous drainage for right intrahepatic duct dilatation in malignant hilar obstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage is being increasingly performed as an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) to treat malignant hilar obstruction (MHO) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, no study has compared EUS-guided hepaticoduodenostomy (EUS-HDS) with PTBD for right intrahepatic duct (IHD) obstruction after failed ERCP in patients with unresectable MHO. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of consecutive patients with right IHD obstruction developed by unresectable MHO who underwent EUS-HDS or PTBD after a previous placement of a stent in the left and/or right IHD between March 2018 and October 2021. Technical success, clinical success, stent or tube-related adverse events, frequency of reintervention, and stent patency were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (18 EUS-HDS, 24 PTBD) were analyzed. Both groups did not show significant differences in technical success (EUS-HDS, 94% vs PTBD, 100%; P = 0.429), clinical success (83% vs 83%; P = 0.999), early adverse events (24% vs 46%; P = 0.144), and stent or tube-related late adverse events (29% vs 54%; P = 0.116). During follow-up, the EUS-HDS group had a longer median duration of patency (131 days vs 58.5 days; P = 0.041), and lower mean frequency of reinterventions per patient (0.35 vs 1.92; P = 0.030) than the PTBD group. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-HDS showed comparable efficacy and safety to PTBD for drainage of the right biliary system and produced longer duration of patency and lower frequency of reinterventions in patients with unresectable MHO.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pain Management.

The diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer has become a standard role for the endoscopic oncologist. Pancreatic cancer can produce disabling abdominal pain, and the medical management of this pain is often challenging. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis and celiac ganglia neurolysis serve as an alternative or adjunct for pain control in these patients. There remains a great deal of practice variability with regard to techniques and approaches. This article summarizes the latest scientific evidence and highlights contemporary best practice advice for these procedures.

Clinical Course of Patients With Mediastinal Lymph Node Tuberculosis and Risk Factors for Paradoxical Responses.

BACKGROUND: Paradoxical responses (PR) occur more frequently in lymph node tuberculosis (LNTB) than in pulmonary tuberculosis and present difficulties in differential diagnosis of drug resistance, new infection, poor patient compliance, and adverse drug reactions. Although diagnosis of mediastinal LNTB has become much easier with the development of endosonography, limited information is available. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical course of mediastinal LNTB and the risk factors associated with PR. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with mediastinal LNTB via endosonography were evaluated retrospectively between October 2009 and December 2019. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to evaluate the risk factors associated with PR. RESULTS: Of 9,052 patients who underwent endosonography during the study period, 158 were diagnosed with mediastinal LNTB. Of these, 55 (35%) and 41 (26%) concurrently had pulmonary tuberculosis and extrapulmonary tuberculosis other than mediastinal LNTB, respectively. Of 125 patients who completed anti-tuberculosis treatment, 21 (17%) developed PR at a median of 4.4 months after initiation of anti-tuberculosis treatment. The median duration of anti-tuberculosis treatment was 6.3 and 10.4 months in patients without and with PR, respectively. Development of PR was independently associated with age < 55 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.81-18.14; P = 0.003), lymphocyte count < 800/µL (aOR, 8.59; 95% CI, 1.60-46.20; P = 0.012), and short axis diameter of the largest lymph node (LN) ≥ 16 mm (aOR, 5.22; 95% CI, 1.70-16.00; P = 0.004) at the time of diagnosis of mediastinal LNTB. CONCLUSION: As PR occurred in one of six patients with mediastinal LNTB during anti-tuberculosis treatment, physicians should pay attention to patients with risk factors (younger age, lymphocytopenia, and larger LN) at the time of diagnosis.

A Transesophageal Cardiovascular Intervention.

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transesophageal pericardiocentesis was performed for a posteriorly located effusion not amenable to transthoracic drainage in a 58-year-old woman with a history of recurrent breast adenocarcinoma who presented with dyspnea. The patient had a pericardial effusion that resulted in cardiac tamponade. Transthoracic pericardiocentesis was unsuitable because of the posterior location of the effusion. Pericardiocentesis via the transesophageal route was performed. The pericardial sac was punctured with a 19-gauge needle, and 245 mL of pericardial fluid were aspirated, resulting in the resolution of the tamponade physiology. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transesophageal drainage is a novel and promising therapeutic option for posteriorly located pericardial effusions.

Pineoblastoma en el adulto. A propósito de un caso

Fundamento: Los pineoblastomas son tumores cerebrales infrecuentes dentro del grupo de los tumores primitivos neuroectodérmicos. La presentación clínica por lo general está relacionada con la obstrucción del acueducto de Silvio, lo que ocasiona hidrocefalia e hipertensión intracraneal. Objetivo: Describir las características clínicas e imagenológicas de un paciente adulto con diagnóstico de pineoblastoma. Presentación de caso: Masculino, 33 años, que comenzó con disminución de la agudeza visual que evolucionó a la amaurosis bilateral y trastorno de la marcha. Se diagnosticó hidrocefalia obstructiva triventricular, por lo cual se realizó tercer ventriculostomía endoscópica. Se decidió un abordaje supracerebeloso infratentorial a la lesión tumoral, con apoyo endoscópico en posición semisentado; se logró la resección parcial. En estudio inmunohistoquímico se encontró Ki-67 mayor de 50 % de las células, neurofilamento y sinaptofisina positiva. Se concluyó como pineoblastoma. Recibió radioterapia convencional con Co-60, fraccionada, con un total de 30 dosis diarias de 2 Gy. La evolución del paciente a los 6 meses de operado fue satisfactoria. Conclusiones: El tratamiento combinado de cirugía y radioterapia constituye un esquema terapéutico ideal en este tipo de lesiones tumorales. La endoscopia es una herramienta de gran valor en los abordajes quirúrgicos a la región pineal.

Background: Pineoblastomas are infrequent brain tumors among the neuroectodermal primitive tumors. Clinical presentation is usually related to Silvian aqueduct obstruction, which causes hydrocephalus and intracranial hypertension. Objective: To describe the clinical and imagenological characteristics in an adult patient diagnosed with pineoblastoma. Case presentation: Male, 33 years old, who started with visual acuity decline that evolved to bilateral amaurosis and gait disorder. Triventricular obstructive hydrocephalus was diagnosed, therefore, an endoscopic third ventriculostomy was realized. It was decided to use an infratentorial supracerebellar approach to the tumor lesion, with endoscopic support in semi-seated position; partial resection was achieved. In immunohistochemical study, Ki-67 was found to be higher than 50% of the cells, neurofilament and synaptophysin positive. It was concluded as pineoblastoma. He received fractionated Co-60 conventional radiotherapy, with a total of 30 daily doses, 2 Gy. The evolution of the patient 6 months after surgery was satisfactory. Conclusions: The combined treatment of surgery and radiotherapy constitutes an ideal therapeutic scheme in this type of tumor lesions. Endoscopy is a tool of great value in surgical approaches to the pineal region.

Prospective clinical trial of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy without fistula dilation for malignant distal biliary obstruction.

Background and Objectives: During EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS), fistula dilation before stent insertion is associated with adverse events (AEs), such as bile leakage and peritonitis. We hypothesized that EUS-CDS without fistula dilation using a novel self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) with a thin delivery system could overcome this problem, and we conducted this study to evaluate its feasibility and safety. Methods: This was an open-label, single-arm, phase II study at a single institution. We planned EUS-CDS without fistula dilation using a fully covered SEMS with a 5.9-Fr delivery system for unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction. The primary outcome was overall technical success. Secondary outcomes were technical success without fistula dilation, procedure time, functional success, time to recurrent biliary obstruction, and AEs. The planned sample size was 25 patients. Results: In total, 24 patients were included in this study. In 21 patients, EUS-CDS was performed as primary drainage. The overall technical success rate was 100% (24 of 24 patients). The technical success rate without fistula dilation was 96% (23 of 24). The median procedure time was 16 min (range, 10-66 min). The functional success rate was 96% (23 of 24). The median time to recurrent biliary obstruction was 148 days (95% confidence interval, 29-266 days). There were no procedure-related AEs. Furthermore, computed tomography immediately after the procedure showed no leakage of contrast medium into the abdominal cavity in any patient. Conclusions: EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy without fistula dilation using a fully covered SEMS with a 5.9-Fr delivery system is feasible with a high probability and can be achieved quickly while effectively preventing bile leakage and peritonitis.

Differential Diagnosis of Thickened Gastric Wall between Hypertrophic Gastritis and Borrmann Type 4 Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Background/Aims: : Accurately diagnosing diffuse gastric wall thickening is challenging. Hypertrophic gastritis (HG), while benign, mimics the morphology of Borrmann type 4 advanced gastric cancer (AGC B-4). We compared the features of endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) between them. Methods: : We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent EUS for gastric wall thickening between 2000 and 2021, selecting HG and pathologically confirmed advanced gastric cancer cases. Ulceration and antral wall thickening were determined via endoscopy, while EUS assessed the 5-layered gastric wall structure, measuring the proper muscle (PM) layer and total wall thickness. Results: : Male dominance was observed in AGC B-4, and the hemoglobin and albumin levels were significantly lower. The rate of antral wall thickening and presence of ulceration were significantly higher in AGC B-4 cases. Destruction of the PM layers was observed only in AGC B-4 cases, and the PM was significantly thicker in AGC B-4 cases. Forceps biopsy had an excellent success rate in ulcer-present AGC B-4 cases, but only a 42.6% success rate was observed for cases without ulcers, necessitating additional diagnostic modalities. A PM thickness of 2.39 mm distinguished between AGC B-4 and HG effectively. The multivariable analysis showed that a thickened PM layer and the presence of ulceration were significant risk factors for the diagnosis of AGC B-4. Conclusions: : Endoscopic findings of a thickened gastric wall, including antral involvement, and presence of ulcer were significant risk factors for the diagnosis of AGC B-4. EUS findings of destroyed wall layers and a thickened PM of >2.39 mm were the key points of differentiation between HG and AGC B-4.

A Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam on Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endosonography Outside the Operating Room.

Background: Patients may experience anxiety, discomfort, and pain during endoscopy, which cannot be tolerated without sedative drugs. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the sedative effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam on patients undergoing endosonography outside the operating room. Methods: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 126 patients aged 18 - 65 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I - II undergoing elective endosonography. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. The dexmedetomidine group received dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) for 25 minutes with propofol (0.5 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1 µg/kg) at the start of the procedure. The midazolam group received midazolam (0.03 mg/kg) with propofol (0.5 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1 µg/kg). Heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded before and 5, 10, and 15 minutes after starting the procedure. The Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) and the need for an additional dose of propofol were recorded during the procedure. The Numeric Pain Rating scale (Ambesh score) scores were recorded at the beginning, immediately after, and 1 hour after the procedure. Nausea and vomiting were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale in cooperation with the patient. Results: The dexmedetomidine group had significantly higher SpO2 and RSS scores during sedation than the midazolam group (P = 0.02). Overall, specialist satisfaction was higher in the dexmedetomidine group than in the midazolam group. There was no clinically significant difference in pain score and nausea and vomiting frequencies between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine is more effective than midazolam for sedation during gastrointestinal endosonography.